Defaced Idaho Stop Signs With Anti-War Message for Sale

This may not have anything to do with Russian propaganda per se, but it is definitely indicative of the anti-war message writ large. I live in the DC area and saw this same thing written on a stop sign. Hell, in my hometown we still have a stop sign that reads "STOP hammer time" and has been there for at least a decade. I saw another one here that had a red sticker with white lettering, which read: "(STOP) driving SUV's". Now, this chicanery is hardly a serious offense, legally, but in many ways I find it offensive nonetheless. The SUV thing is another issue entirely (if they really wanted to cut down on emissions then they should protest private jets and airplanes in general). The "Stop War" thing is, admittedly clever, but a moot point. What these protesters (most likely spoiled college kids) don't realise is that in many cases the only way to stop war is with war. Anti-war sentiments from one country play right into the hands of the adversary, especially the extreme Salafist jihad adversary we face now. Of all the anti-war war rallies I begrudgingly attended, never did I see anything protesting Saddam Hussein (well except for Iraqi national counter-protesters numbering about 50 who were summarily razzed by the peaceniks), nor Usama Bin Ladin, nor al-Qaeda. I mean seriously, these people just can't be taken at face value, it's not an anti-war statement it's an anti-America statement. If they really wanted to stop war they would call on all sides to cut the shit, but they don't, they just blame the USA and Israel, which of course is a familiar fad. What really irks me about damaging a stop sign however, is that these people are not only destroying state property but making money off of it. Any pea brain that would spend 80 dollars on a stop sign that he/she could make for 25 bucks needs their head examined. Now, in all fairness if the sign said "STOP anti-war whiners", well...



Friday , June 13, 2008

IDAHO FALLS, Idaho — A war protest in which 179 stop signs were defaced by stenciling the word "war" in white letters under the "stop" has morphed into an exercise in free market capitalism.
A judge ordered that at least some of the defaced stop signs belonged to the people who vandalized them once they paid restitution. Those signs are now being sold — briskly and at a profit — for $80 apiece.
It has also encouraged others in the region noted for its conservative voting record to come forward with their own misgivings about the war in Iraq.
"I really am shocked almost weekly by hearing people tell me, 'Thank you,"' 19-year-old Alexander Piet told the Post Register. "It's really refreshing."
He said he will autograph some of the signs he's sold when he returns to this eastern Idaho city from classes at the University of Washington.
Piet and 20-year-old Craig Bakker vandalized the signs last year, and earlier this year pleaded guilty to misdemeanor vandalism in 7th District Court. Authorities say three juveniles also took part in the vandalism, but their identities and the resolution of their cases, and whether they received any of the signs, has not been made public.
Piet and Bakker were each ordered to pay restitution for 20 signs at $60.86 per sign, adding up to $1,217.20. Both also were ordered to pay a $500 fine, plus $72.50 in court costs.
Piet has paid his restitution and received his 20 signs, and has sold 14 so far for $80 apiece. At that price, if he sells the remaining six, he would recoup $1,600 in all.
The restitution, fine and court costs add up to $1,789.70. But the $80 could be less than the market will bear.
One of the signs sold for $300 and another for $275 after the Bonneville County Democrats bought them from Piet and then auctioned them off at the annual Truman Banquet fundraiser May 3.
One was bought by Dan Henry, a member of the Snake River Freedom Coalition that formed after the signs were defaced to encourage less destructive forms of protest.
Henry is also head of the local chapter of Drinking Liberally, a national group that describes itself as "an informal, inclusive progressive social group." He said the sign he purchased will be displayed on the group's float during this year's Fourth of July parade in Idaho Falls.
Thomas Hally, an Idaho Falls City Council member, disagreed with the judge's decision to allow the vandals to own the signs.
"The war is a volatile issue," he said. "But no one has the right to destroy public or private property to express an opinion, and I don't think one should profit from that."

Active Measure: JFK Assassination Conspiracy

This has long been a favorite among conspiracy theorists. I relied heavily on Mitrokhin's book (see previous post) to sum up the basics.
JFK's assassin, as we are well aware, was Lee Harvey Oswald. What many people do not know or have forgotten was that Oswald defected to the USSR in 1959 over "disgust" with the American system and admiration for the Soviet system. After subsequently annoying the Russians, he returned to Texas in 1962 with a Russian wife in tow. Various accounts claim that Oswald was unstable and a nuisance. But the fact that he had indeed previously defected proved to be an embarrassment to the Soviets; an embarrassment that they wanted to go away.
After the Warren Commission concluded that Oswald had indeed acted alone and was not part of some Soviet conspiracy per se, the KGB sponsored the services of Carl Aldo Marzani, an American citizen, yet Italian born Communist codenamed NORD through his book publishing company Liberty Book Club (affiliated with book selling network Prometheus Book Club), codenamed SEVER, with a $15,000 grant to publish pro Soviet materials.
Upon this, Joachim Jösten (Joesten), a German author, later published a book called Oswald: Assassin or Fall Guy? Joesten supported Moscow's assertion that the blame be place upon a group of racist right-wingers, most notable among them was "oil magnate" H.L. Hunt. Joesten's quotation inducing story basically asserted that the "right-wingers" were wary of Kennedy's wish to squelch the "military-industrial complex", thus starting the basis for a theme that would reoccur for the next 30 years: Oswald had ties to the FBI and CIA and was killed by the US Government to prevent him from talking.
Around this time, the Warren Commission's findings were drowning out Joesten's assertions. In rebuttal,  the KGB identified and financially supported New York lawyer Mark Lane as the most able conspiracy theorist to propagate said theme.

Mark Lane is well known as a person with close ties to Democratic Party
circles in the US. He hold liberal views on a number of current American
political problems and has undertaken to conduct his own private
investigation of the circumstances surrounding the murder of J.F. Kennedy.
(Mitrokhin Archive vol. 6 ch. 14, part 3.)

After the Watergate scandal, a new life was given to the CIA involved conspiracy theory where Service A was responsible for an active measure against E. Howard Hunt (not to be confused with H.L. Hunt, despite the fact the press did just that) a former CIA officer involved with the Watergate scandal. Thus, a letter, codenamed ARLINGTON, was forged to a Mr. Hunt "signed" by Oswald. This was actually fabricated by the Soviets based on phrases and expressions Oswald had used in the USSR. The forged letter is as follows:

Dear Mr. Hunt,
I would like information concerning my
position. I am only
asking for information. I am suggesting that we discuss
the matter fully before
any steps are taken by me or anybody else.
Thank-you
Lee Harvey Oswald
(Ibid).

There was much confusion and speculation as to who Mr. Hunt was. The KGB wanted to spin the story into a yarn of CIA involvement, hence focusing on E. Howard Hunt vice H.L. Hunt, the Texas oil man. It is unclear whether the KGB itself had confused the two names, but one thing is clear: the USSR's conspiracy theory, made possible through KGB active measures and the US government's own inadvertent confusion, could rightfully claim that even in the late 1970s more Americans believed the KGB orchestrated conspiracy theory than did believe the official findings of the Warren Commission. Now if somebody could just tell that to Oliver Stone.

So detailed it hurts

One of the most detailed books dealing with the KGB and their antics, especially with the "Main Adversary" aka the USA. Most interesting is chapter 14 called Political Warfare. This chapter deals with "active measures" or influence operations carried out against the United States. Service A is the component of the KGB responsible for such operations, and will be one of the main sources I will cite in detailing deceptive propaganda used against America that many of her cinspiracy-oriented citizens still believe to be factual such as: the USA invented AIDS, the CIA killed JFK, and J. Edgar Hoover was a transvestite homosexual. It would surprise few if we were to find out the FSB (formerly known as KGB) was funding some propagation of 9/11 conspiracy theories.

Anti-War Protests in DC Funded By The Revolutionary Communist Party

Iraqi Gives Thanks At Pro-Troop Rally (Ok, this was a pro-troop rally but was later interrupted by anti-war "activists" crashing the Party).






Iraqi's Give Thanks At Pro-Troop Rally Part 2: The "Peace" Movement Strikes Back





Pro-Troopers Sound Off

Comrades and the Peace Movement: The Vietnam Redux

If any of you have seen any of the videos I have posted that deal with the peace rallies in DC, some may say I am going overboard or painting everything with a broad pink brush. I wish that were true, but the fact of the matter is the vast majority of groups represented at these anti-war rallies are not what they claim to be. They claim they are for "peace", yet support tyranical regimes. They claim they are against war, but are silent about wars, which have been fought in the name of utopian societies as we see in communist or socialist regimes e.g. China, Cuba and Venezuela. They are all too quick to condemn the USA for pouring water over terrorist masterminds' faces, but turned a blind eye to Saddam's past transgressions or Iran's murdering of gays, political detractors or their strapping of cords around teenagers and old women's necks to to be hoisted up slowly by crane in a public square for all to see. I have seen these things; it is truly heart-wrenching, and yet I don't see the streets of Washington DC filled with angry activists condemning such actions.
This brings me to Vietnam and the propaganda machine they had going. Vietnam, I admit, is very similar to what is going on in Iraq. First, however, let's get the differences out of the way; Vietnam was never a threat to us, nor did they have 16 UN resolution slapped upon them, nor was there intelligence indicating they may give bio or chemical weapons to proxy agents, nor did they bribe the UN and other not so United Nations i.e. France, Russia, Germany etc., nor did the Vietcong plan to reconstitute a nuclear program after sanctions were lifted due to the bribing of said countries. What is very similar, aside from the fact that the USA lost not a single military battle in either theater, is that we lost and are losing the information war. They say the pen is mightier than the sword, and in that vein, perception and the not-so-invisible hand of public opinion is mightier than the A-Bomb.
The Vietcong reveled at the site of dead Vietnamese civilians for its propaganda value, whether caused by the USA or not, much like al-Qaeda gloats when it can cause as much havoc as possible. The formula is simple, the more chaos created that will be pinned on the Superpower the better; the side with the big guns, regardless of the fact that the US military practically jumps through its own rear end to avoid civilian casualties, will always look like the bully. A lot of these peace protesters, hard as it is to imagine, want the US to lose. Yes, I will say it again: A lot of peace protesters want the US to lose. This is the same attitude the prevailed during the Vietnam era, and it worked. What is more chilling, is the fact that the same communist utopian ideological groups whose agenda it was to see the US raise the white flag, bowing to Soviet interests, are of the same cloth as those funding anti-war rallies today, see below. Just think about this: If the same media we have today were embedded with US troops during World War II, we probably would be living in very different, German speaking if you will, world. Scary isn't it?
One can debate the merits for why the US intervened in the later wars. That is another topic for another day, but the fact remains that when the media starts playing politics and foreign media picks up our news and broadcasts thousands of people pontificating in the streets of DC calling Bush a war criminal and the US government filthy liars, it does nothing but embolden those who wish to do us harm. And as far as I am concerned, I would rather keep my moral compass away from those who are trying to kill me.

Here are some Wikipedia.org blurbs dealing with the main groups funding today's "peace" rallies:

Revolutionary Communist Party, USA (RCP, USA), known originally as the
Revolutionary Union, is a Maoist-oriented communist party formed in 1975 in the
United States.

United for Peace and Justice
Ms. Cagan was a founder of the Committees of Correspondence for Democracy and Socialism, a spin-off group of the Communist Party in America.

Workers World Party (WWP) is a communist party in the United States founded in 1959 by Sam Marcy. During the Civil Rights Movement the WWP had a youth movement, "Youth Against War and Fascism", which opposed the Vietnam War. Workers World and YAWF were also notable for their consistent defense of the Black Panthers and the Weather Underground along with Vietnam Veterans Against the War.

Other groups affiliated, albeit more clandestinely, with communist agendas:

http://www.answercoalition.org/

International Action Center

Not In Our Name

All People's Congress

And here some more blurbs from Wikipedia.org:

Both ANSWER and the International Action Center are closely allied with a small
but energetic Marxist-Leninist organization known as the Workers World Party,
which in its turbulent history has supported the Soviet interventions in Hungary
and Czechoslovakia, the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, and the Chinese
government's crackdown in Tiananmen Square. Today, the WWP devotes much of its energy to supporting the regimes in Iraq and North Korea.

Welcome

This blog isn't about me or any particular axe I have to grind. This is about trying to be successful in a very complicated battle between Western civilization and guerrilla forces wrongly invoking the name of God as a cover for their cult of terrorism. The current situation goes deeper than this however; this deals with exploiting one group to pit them against another. Such is the case with the Soviet Union successfully being able to help convince much of the world, especially the Third world, that Americans were nothing but greedy imperialists hellbent on dominating the world. This sentiment has been carried over in the shape of leftist college professors and so-called anti-war protesters. The anti-war movement is certainly nothing new. While there are some legitimate peacenicks, the vast majority are, often unwittingly, pawns of an ideology that cares not about peace, but the downfall of Western Society. Most of what I will be posting deals with Soviet/communist propaganda and how this has influenced public opinion from the Cold War up until now.
v/r
USNAVYVET2002